<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Business requirements up front</title>
	<atom:link href="http://robertlambert.net/2010/03/plan-decide-ac/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://robertlambert.net/2010/03/plan-decide-ac/</link>
	<description>on business-aligned information technology</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 01 May 2012 15:54:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob Lambert &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Agile development: rugby analogy considered harmful</title>
		<link>http://robertlambert.net/2010/03/plan-decide-ac/comment-page-1/#comment-1132</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob Lambert &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Agile development: rugby analogy considered harmful</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Dec 2010 17:53:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://robertlambert.net/?p=866#comment-1132</guid>
		<description>[...] the business world, as I&#8217;ve written, the roadmap for a custom application development project is an executive-approved business case [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] the business world, as I&#8217;ve written, the roadmap for a custom application development project is an executive-approved business case [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob Lambert</title>
		<link>http://robertlambert.net/2010/03/plan-decide-ac/comment-page-1/#comment-890</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob Lambert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Apr 2010 13:23:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://robertlambert.net/?p=866#comment-890</guid>
		<description>True David, I&#039;m not interested in the religious wars either.  Really the issue seems to be how to do it in a way that the folks we&#039;re doing it for are happy, don&#039;t you think?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>True David, I&#8217;m not interested in the religious wars either.  Really the issue seems to be how to do it in a way that the folks we&#8217;re doing it for are happy, don&#8217;t you think?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Wright</title>
		<link>http://robertlambert.net/2010/03/plan-decide-ac/comment-page-1/#comment-887</link>
		<dc:creator>David Wright</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Mar 2010 23:59:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://robertlambert.net/?p=866#comment-887</guid>
		<description>Good stuff, but...

&quot;Please don’t read this as repudiation of Agile methods and advocation of “big requirements up front”.  &quot; 

Sorry, but Mr. Ambler and others will read it exactly this way. What is needed to take out the word &quot;big&quot; from that tortuous phrase and replace it with &quot;enough&quot; or &quot;sufficient&quot;. Other than that, practitioners will either do what you describe, or not, with sufficient justification needed to convince project sponsors that what they are doing is right....until it isn&#039;t.

The thing is, either approach can work; I just get tired of anyone who says only their approach works, whatever it is.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good stuff, but&#8230;</p>
<p>&#8220;Please don’t read this as repudiation of Agile methods and advocation of “big requirements up front”.  &#8221; </p>
<p>Sorry, but Mr. Ambler and others will read it exactly this way. What is needed to take out the word &#8220;big&#8221; from that tortuous phrase and replace it with &#8220;enough&#8221; or &#8220;sufficient&#8221;. Other than that, practitioners will either do what you describe, or not, with sufficient justification needed to convince project sponsors that what they are doing is right&#8230;.until it isn&#8217;t.</p>
<p>The thing is, either approach can work; I just get tired of anyone who says only their approach works, whatever it is.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

