<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Bob Lambert</title>
	<atom:link href="http://robertlambert.net/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://robertlambert.net</link>
	<description>on business-aligned information technology</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 04 May 2012 10:51:07 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>So Agile/Scrum Really IS Like Rugby</title>
		<link>http://robertlambert.net/2012/05/so-agilescrum-really-is-like-rugby/</link>
		<comments>http://robertlambert.net/2012/05/so-agilescrum-really-is-like-rugby/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 May 2012 15:54:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Bob</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[App Dev]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Project Management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[agile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Application Development]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Leading & Following]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://robertlambert.net/?p=1219</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[OK, I&#8217;ve lost a five-metre scrum, my pack has been overrun, and the ref has raised his arm between the sticks for a penalty try.  My colleague Margy Thomas, with support of fellow rugger Billy Tilson, has convincingly argued that agile development in fact is very like rugby union. Margy cleverly fended my meager one-point case with <a href='http://robertlambert.net/2012/05/so-agilescrum-really-is-like-rugby/' class='excerpt-more'>[...]</a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://robertlambert.net/2012/05/so-agilescrum-really-is-like-rugby/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Big Data opportunities and NoSQL challenges</title>
		<link>http://robertlambert.net/2012/04/big-data-opportunities-and-nosql-challenges/</link>
		<comments>http://robertlambert.net/2012/04/big-data-opportunities-and-nosql-challenges/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Apr 2012 18:43:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Bob</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[App Dev]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Data Management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alignment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Data Modeling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Database Design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Requirements]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://robertlambert.net/?p=1346</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As a relational database professional I couldn’t help but feel like something would be lost with the emergence of the new Big Data/NoSQL database management systems (DBMS). After about two years of buzz around the topic, I’m really excited about the emerging possibilities. However, I’m pretty sure we’ll miss the relational model’s strengths in requirements <a href='http://robertlambert.net/2012/04/big-data-opportunities-and-nosql-challenges/' class='excerpt-more'>[...]</a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://robertlambert.net/2012/04/big-data-opportunities-and-nosql-challenges/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The data quality challenge, in pictures</title>
		<link>http://robertlambert.net/2012/03/the-data-quality-challenge-in-pictures/</link>
		<comments>http://robertlambert.net/2012/03/the-data-quality-challenge-in-pictures/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Mar 2012 15:01:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Bob</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Data Management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alignment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Data Quality]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://robertlambert.net/?p=1311</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Data quality in most large organizations is commonly known to be rather lacking.  Most would argue that things haven&#8217;t gotten much better since this 2007 Accenture study found that &#8220;Managers Say the Majority of Information Obtained for Their Work Is Useless&#8221;. To some, quotes like that are shocking, but if you think about how information <a href='http://robertlambert.net/2012/03/the-data-quality-challenge-in-pictures/' class='excerpt-more'>[...]</a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://robertlambert.net/2012/03/the-data-quality-challenge-in-pictures/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A QlikView QuickStart: first steps for learning QlikView desktop</title>
		<link>http://robertlambert.net/2012/01/a-qlikview-quickstart-first-steps-for-learning-qlikview-desktop/</link>
		<comments>http://robertlambert.net/2012/01/a-qlikview-quickstart-first-steps-for-learning-qlikview-desktop/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jan 2012 21:02:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Bob</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[App Dev]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Data Management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Business Intelligence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Data Modeling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Database Design]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://robertlambert.net/?p=1299</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[QlikTech&#8217;s QlikView reporting and analysis tool is among a new class of Business Intelligence (BI) software tools. As Ben Harden reported in a recent blog post, BI vendors like SAP, Microsoft, and IBM have traditionally sold “to the IT enterprise, but companies like QlikTech and Tableau are targeting the business and bypassing IT. Their tools <a href='http://robertlambert.net/2012/01/a-qlikview-quickstart-first-steps-for-learning-qlikview-desktop/' class='excerpt-more'>[...]</a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://robertlambert.net/2012/01/a-qlikview-quickstart-first-steps-for-learning-qlikview-desktop/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Double test efficiency and build app dev culture at no charge</title>
		<link>http://robertlambert.net/2011/12/double-test-efficiency/</link>
		<comments>http://robertlambert.net/2011/12/double-test-efficiency/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Dec 2011 14:05:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Bob</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[App Dev]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[agile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Application Development]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Leading & Following]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Project Management]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://robertlambert.net/?p=1255</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What if you could double the efficiency of your software testing process, and substantially reduce errors found during the test, deployment, and maintenance phases, without purchasing any tool or method? The November 28 InformationWeek offers just that in a reprint of a recent Dr. Dobbs article on formal inspections by Capers Jones and Olivier Bonsignour.  <a href='http://robertlambert.net/2011/12/double-test-efficiency/' class='excerpt-more'>[...]</a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://robertlambert.net/2011/12/double-test-efficiency/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The gnarly, subtle-seeming data quality question</title>
		<link>http://robertlambert.net/2011/11/the-gnarly-subtle-seeming-data-quality-question/</link>
		<comments>http://robertlambert.net/2011/11/the-gnarly-subtle-seeming-data-quality-question/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Nov 2011 03:53:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Bob</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Data Management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Data Quality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Strategy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://robertlambert.net/?p=1236</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I’ve posted a couple of articles at my company’s blog site that reflect my view on data quality efforts: Yes, there is a business case for improving data quality, and I’ve got real business value examples. If you look for real money where you anecdotally know there are data quality problems, you’ll likely find it <a href='http://robertlambert.net/2011/11/the-gnarly-subtle-seeming-data-quality-question/' class='excerpt-more'>[...]</a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://robertlambert.net/2011/11/the-gnarly-subtle-seeming-data-quality-question/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Project managers: is yellow the new green?</title>
		<link>http://robertlambert.net/2011/10/project-managers-is-yellow-the-new-green/</link>
		<comments>http://robertlambert.net/2011/10/project-managers-is-yellow-the-new-green/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Oct 2011 11:24:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Bob</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[IT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Project Management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alignment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Leading & Following]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://robertlambert.net/?p=1226</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I’ve never understood the obsession with “green” status among IT application development project managers, and the intense pressure put on them to “stay green” by the program management offices (PMOs) they report to. We would benefit from a cultural shift away from avoiding yellow status. For those not in the field, it is in vogue <a href='http://robertlambert.net/2011/10/project-managers-is-yellow-the-new-green/' class='excerpt-more'>[...]</a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://robertlambert.net/2011/10/project-managers-is-yellow-the-new-green/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Abstracting and recombining all the way to the bank</title>
		<link>http://robertlambert.net/2011/08/abstracting-and-recombining-all-the-way-to-the-bank/</link>
		<comments>http://robertlambert.net/2011/08/abstracting-and-recombining-all-the-way-to-the-bank/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Aug 2011 14:32:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Bob</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[App Dev]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alignment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Business Analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Business Intelligence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Data Modeling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Database Design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Strategy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://robertlambert.net/?p=1208</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In the past I&#8217;ve never understood what people really mean they say &#8220;think outside the box&#8221; but Jim Harris, in a recent OCDQ blog post, helped me figure it out. Mr. Harris ends with this provocative line: &#8220;the bottom line is Google and Facebook have socialized data in order to capitalize data as a true corporate asset.&#8221;  The post <a href='http://robertlambert.net/2011/08/abstracting-and-recombining-all-the-way-to-the-bank/' class='excerpt-more'>[...]</a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://robertlambert.net/2011/08/abstracting-and-recombining-all-the-way-to-the-bank/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Get an early start for on-time data modeling</title>
		<link>http://robertlambert.net/2011/07/get-an-early-start-for-on-time-data-modeling/</link>
		<comments>http://robertlambert.net/2011/07/get-an-early-start-for-on-time-data-modeling/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Jul 2011 22:14:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Bob</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[App Dev]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Data Management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Project Management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Business Analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Data Modeling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Database Design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Requirements]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://robertlambert.net/?p=1201</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#8217;m a data modeler, so I enjoyed Jonathon Geiger&#8217;s recent article entitled &#8220;Why Does Data Modeling Take So Long&#8221;.  But why does he say it like it&#8217;s a bad thing? Mr. Geiger&#8217;s bottom line is exactly right: &#8220;Most of the time spent developing data models is consumed developing or clarifying the requirements and business rules <a href='http://robertlambert.net/2011/07/get-an-early-start-for-on-time-data-modeling/' class='excerpt-more'>[...]</a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://robertlambert.net/2011/07/get-an-early-start-for-on-time-data-modeling/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Thoughts after agile training: strengthening values, reducing the cost of honesty, and growing apps</title>
		<link>http://robertlambert.net/2011/05/thoughts-after-agile-training/</link>
		<comments>http://robertlambert.net/2011/05/thoughts-after-agile-training/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 May 2011 13:38:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Bob</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[App Dev]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Data Management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[agile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Data Modeling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Leading & Following]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Project Management]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://robertlambert.net/?p=1194</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I recently completed ScrumMaster training ably presented by Lyssa Adkins. Throughout the two-day class we appreciated Lyssa’s Zen-like, enabling, style. If her name is familiar, it’s because Ms. Adkins is the author of the book Coaching Agile Teams, one of the leading texts on the subject. I’ve participated on agile projects, but so far only <a href='http://robertlambert.net/2011/05/thoughts-after-agile-training/' class='excerpt-more'>[...]</a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://robertlambert.net/2011/05/thoughts-after-agile-training/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

